Clinical Utility of Ileal Motility in Children With Defecation Disorders and Children With Chronic Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about ileal motility patterns and their utility in children. Here, we present our experience with children undergoing ileal manometry (IM). METHODS: A retrospective review of children with ileostomy comparing IM between 2 groups: A [chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO)] and B (feasibility of ileostomy closure in children with defecation disorders). We also compared the IM findings with those from antroduodenal manometry (ADM), and evaluated the joint effect of age, sex, and study indication group on IM results. RESULTS: A total of 27 children (median age 5.8 years old, range 0.5-16.74 years, 16 were female) were included (12 in group A and 15 in group B). There was no association between IM interpretation and sex; however younger age was associated with abnormal IM ( P = 0.021). We found a significantly higher proportion of patients with presence of phase III of the migrating motor complex (MMC) during fasting and normal postprandial response in group B than in group A ( P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that only Group B was associated with normal IM ( P < 0.001). We found a moderate agreement for the presence of phase III MMC and postprandial response between IM and ADM (kappa = 0.698, P = 0.008 and kappa = 0.683, P = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: IM is abnormal in patients with CIPO and normal in patients with defecation disorders, suggesting that IM may be not needed for ostomy closure in those with defecation disorders. IM has a moderate agreement with ADM and could be used as a surrogate for small bowel motility.

Clinical utility of colonic low-amplitude propagating contractions in children with functional constipation.

BACKGROUND: Colonic high-amplitude propagating contractions (HAPC) are generally accepted as a marker of neuromuscular integrity. Little is known about low-amplitude propagating contractions (LAPCs); we evaluated their clinical utility in children. METHODS: Retrospective review of children with functional constipation undergoing low-resolution colon manometry (CM) recording HAPCs and LAPCs (physiologic or bisacodyl-induced) in three groups: constipation, antegrade colonic enemas (ACE), and ileostomy. Outcome (therapy response) was compared to LAPCs in all patients and within groups. We evaluated LAPCs as potentially representing failed HAPCs. KEY RESULTS: A total of 445 patients were included (median age 9.0 years, 54% female), 73 had LAPCs. We found no association between LAPCs and outcome (all patients, p = 0.121), corroborated by logistic regression and excluding HAPCs. We found an association between physiologic LAPCs and outcome that disappears when excluding HAPCs or controlling with logistic regression. We found no association between outcome and bisacodyl-induced LAPCs or LAPC propagation. We found an association between LAPCs and outcome only in the constipation group that cancels with logistic regression and excluding HAPCs (p = 0.026, 0.062, and 0.243, respectively). We found a higher proportion of patients with LAPCs amongst those with absent or abnormally propagated (absent or partially propagated) HAPCs compared to those with fully propagated HAPCs (p = 0.001 and 0.004, respectively) suggesting LAPCs may represent failed HAPCs. CONCLUSIONS/INFERENCES: LAPCs do not seem to have added clinical significance in pediatric functional constipation; CM interpretation could rely primarily on the presence of HAPCs. LAPCs may represent failed HAPCs. Larger studies are needed to further validate these findings.

Diverting Ileostomy in Children With Functional Constipation: A Study Evaluating the Utility of Colon Manometry.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric functional constipation (FC) may require invasive evaluations [like colon manometry (CM)] and surgical interventions [including diverting ostomy (DO)]. We evaluated the utility of CM in guiding surgery after DO. METHODS: Children with medically refractory FC undergoing an ostomy were included. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this retrospective study. Demographics and CM variables [high amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs)] were recorded. Outcome measures: response to ostomy closure defined as successful if no need for further surgery after ostomy closure, and improvement on baseline CM after ostomy. A CM-guided ostomy closure algorithm was developed based on previous studies. We evaluated the association between response to ostomy closure and demographics, ostomy indication and CM improvement, and evaluated the role of CM predicting response using algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 60 children underwent ostomy for FC (median age: 7.1 years, range 0.15-23.6 years, 50% female). Ostomy was closed in 30 patients and deemed successful in 23 of 30. CM was performed in 42 of 60 patients before ostomy and in 29 of 30 before ostomy closure. We found no association between ostomy outcome and age, gender, weight, imaging studies, follow-up time, time with ostomy, HAPCs, and CM improvement. We found an association between failed response and ostomy indication of antegrade colonic enemas (ACE) failure ( P = 0.026) and successful response when ostomy closure was guided by algorithm ( P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: DO is a useful intervention in selected children with medically refractory FC, improving colon motility in most. CM can successfully guide the timing and type of ostomy closure. Larger studies are needed to further validate our findings.

Diagnostic and clinical utility of the wireless motility capsule in children: A study in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders.

BACKGROUND: The wireless motility capsule (WMC) evaluates gastrointestinal motility and transit simultaneously. We evaluated the utility of the WMC in children with functional gastrointestinal symptoms. METHODS: Study in children comparing WMC transit and motility parameters between those with upper (UGI) or lower (LGI) gastrointestinal symptoms, nuclear medicine gastric emptying time (NMGET) and/or a colonic radiopaque marker (CROM) study. KEY RESULTS: We prospectively recruited 57 children (median age 16.45y, range 8.78-17.8y, 44 Female) and 50 completed the study (24 UGI/26 LGI). We found no association between WMC study interpretation, motility and transit parameters and symptoms. WMC and NMGET interpretation agreement observed in 24/34 (70%) (κ = 0.351, p = 0.026) and with CROM in 17/21 (81%) patients (κ = 0.576, p = 0.007). WMC detected abnormal gastric transit in 41% vs. 24% with NMGET (p = 0.04) and abnormal colon transit in 62% vs. 71% of patients by CROM (p = 0.01). We found significant correlation (r = 0.574, p = 0.01) and no difference in median colon transit (p = 0.421) by WMC and CROM. A single WMC motility parameter, mean peak amplitude, was associated with NMGET (p = 0.04), none with CROM. Capsule retention >5 days (n = 9, all passed <2 weeks) was associated with prolonged colon transit, not with symptoms, age and gender. CONCLUSIONS: WMC is well tolerated in children as young as 8 years old. We found no association between WMC and symptoms, fair agreement with NMGET and strong agreement with CROM. WMC increases the yield of finding gastrointestinal transit abnormalities. Capsule retention in children is associated to prolonged colon transit. Larger studies are needed to further validate these findings.